Evidence-based recognition for social entrepreneurs.

The LSSE Society of Social Entrepreneurs awards professional recognition through a structured assessment process based on evidence, judgement, integrity and contribution. Recognition is not automatic and is only granted where applicants meet the standard for the relevant membership grade.

Assessment Principles

LSSE assessments are guided by five core principles.

Evidence

Recognition must be supported by credible evidence, not self-description alone.

Proportionality

Applicants are assessed against the appropriate level of recognition. Early-stage applicants are not expected to provide the same evidence as senior practitioners.

Integrity

All claims must be accurate, responsible and capable of being reviewed.

Professional Conduct

Recognition depends not only on achievement, but also on ethical practice, responsible leadership and compliance with Society rules.

Independence

Where required, assessment decisions are reviewed by appropriate LSSE assessors, moderators or panel members.

LSSE may request further information, clarification or a private review conversation where required.

Recognition Levels

GradePost-NominalAssessment Focus
Associate Social EntrepreneurASE-LSSESocial purpose, beneficiary awareness, ethical intent and credible project direction
Certified Social EntrepreneurCSE-LSSEActive practice, delivery logic, stakeholder understanding, sustainability and impact evidence
Professional Social EntrepreneurPSE-LSSESustained delivery, leadership, partnerships, income, grants, contracts or institutional engagement
Fellow of Social EntrepreneurshipFSE-LSSESenior contribution, ecosystem leadership, philanthropy, civic impact or public-value institution building

Applicants should select the grade that best matches their evidence and experience. LSSE may recommend a different grade where the submitted evidence is stronger or weaker than the level applied for.

Evidence Requirements

Applicants may be asked to submit evidence across the following areas, depending on the grade:

  • Social purpose and problem definition;
  • Beneficiary or stakeholder understanding;
  • Project, venture or organisational activity;
  • Leadership or delivery responsibility;
  • Governance, ethics and accountability;
  • Income, grants, partnerships, contracts or resources;
  • Outputs, outcomes or impact evidence;
  • Case studies, reports or project documents;
  • References or endorsements;
  • Reflective statement or leadership contribution statement.

Evidence should be clear, relevant and truthful. LSSE may request clarification where claims are unclear or unsupported.

Portfolio Guidance

A portfolio is the main evidence document for assessed professional membership.

A strong portfolio should include:

Applicant Profile

A short professional background and current role.

Social Purpose

The problem, need or opportunity the applicant is addressing.

Practice Evidence

Description of the project, organisation, venture, programme or contribution.

Impact Evidence

Outputs, outcomes, beneficiary feedback, reports, case studies or measurable indicators where available.

Delivery and Sustainability

How the work is delivered, resourced and sustained.

Stakeholder and Beneficiary Evidence

Who the work serves and how the applicant understands their needs.

The level of detail expected will depend on the grade applied for.

Interview and Panel Review

Some recognition grades may require interview, presentation or panel review.

ASE-LSSE

Normally assessed through foundation portfolio and reflective statement.

CSE-LSSE

May require portfolio review, project or venture case study and final presentation.

PSE-LSSE

Normally requires experience portfolio, case study and professional interview.

FSE-LSSE

Requires nomination or application, evidence dossier, references and senior panel review.

The level of detail expected will depend on the grade applied for.

Assessor Independence

LSSE protects assessment integrity through appropriate assessor controls.

Where possible:

  • assessors must declare conflicts of interest;
  • assessors should not approve applicants they have materially coached or prepared;
  • higher-level recognition should involve more than one reviewer or panel input;
  • Fellowship assessment should include senior review and reputational consideration;
  • assessment records should be retained for audit, appeals and quality assurance.

These controls help ensure that recognition is based on evidence, not personal association, payment or informal endorsement.

Assessment Outcomes

Some recognition grades may require interview, presentation or panel review.

Approved

The applicant meets the standard for the grade applied for.

Approved at a Different Grade

The applicant is suitable for recognition, but at a different level than requested.

Deferred

The applicant may be reconsidered after submitting additional evidence or gaining further experience.

Not Approved

The applicant does not currently meet the required standard.

Where appropriate, LSSE may provide brief guidance on next steps, evidence gaps or progression options.

Appeals Process

Applicants may request a review of an assessment outcome where they believe:

  • the process was not followed correctly;
  • relevant evidence was not considered;
  • there was a conflict of interest;
  • an administrative error affected the outcome.

Appeals should be submitted within the timeframe stated in LSSE’s assessment policy.

An appeal does not guarantee a change of outcome. It is a review of process and fairness, not an automatic reassessment.

Revocation or Misuse of Post-Nominals

LSSE may suspend or withdraw recognition where a member:

Misuses LSSE post-nominals

Misrepresents their status or grade

Submits false or misleading evidence

Breaches the Society Member Code of Conduct

Causes serious reputational risk to LSSE or the Society

Fails to remain in good standing where required

Uses recognition to imply statutory authority,

Chartered status or government licensing

Post-nominals may only be used by approved members in good standing and in accordance with LSSE rules.

Recognition Disclaimer

LSSE professional recognition is institutional recognition issued by the London School of Social Enterprise and Sustainable Economics through the LSSE Society of Social Entrepreneurs.

It is not statutory licensing, chartered status, government-regulated professional authorisation or permission to practise.

Completion of an LSSE programme, payment of a fee, Open Membership or attendance at Society activities does not automatically confer professional recognition.

Recognition is awarded only after evidence review, assessment and approval.

Ready to apply for assessed recognition?

Apply for assessment if you are ready to evidence your social enterprise practice, leadership or contribution.